Q: could it be ok to possess all my documents published into the exact same log?

Q: could it be ok to possess all my documents published into the exact same log?

I will be a connect teacher in Neurology at Zhejiang University.

Up to now, We have posted 90% of my documents when you look at the high-impact-factor journal Stroke. But my Department seat has required us to begin considering other journals. I would really like your viewpoint on whether it’s safer to submit articles to only one log or if perhaps i ought to give consideration to a lot of different journals.

There are several pros and cons to publishing many documents to a solitary log. The most crucial benefit is you become really knowledgeable about that journal’s range, distribution demands, and composing style. And that means you don’t need to invest time that is too much attempting to comprehend these fundamental aspects; you will be fairly certain your projects appropriately fits the range associated with log and may hence make use of your time better, when you look at the real submission procedure plus in giving an answer to peer reviewer responses. Another advantage is the fact that publishing all your valuable work with one log, especially a very specific journal, can help you quickly gain recognition in your industry of research, because many scientists on the go are going to read your complete human body of work with that log. In fact, journals usually ultimately invite their regular contributors to engage in their editorial panels.

One disadvantage to publishing in only one log is the fact that tenure and grant committees checker online may concern your good reasons for doing this. It would likely result in doubts about whether you’ve got some type of affiliation into the journal’s editorial board or knowledge of the journal’s peer reviewers, which plays a part in your constant effective book in that log. More to the point, in the event that journal’s effect element drops abruptly in a specific 12 months, the caliber of your complete human body of work can be unduly questioned.

Probably one of the most obvious advantages of diversifying your target journals is it generates work accessible to a wider array of visitors. You are able to differ between (a) journals posted by educational communities, that are mostly look over by culture people; (b) subscription-based journals, that are often held by institutional libraries and read by scientists in those organizations; and (c) open access journals, whose content is easily available to perhaps the public. Publishing to various journals provides the rich and challenging connection with matching with different editorial boards and peer reviewers. Further, showing multiple journal that is high-ranking your application could indicate a diverse applicability of the research and so increase your standing.

I am aware that at this point, you really need to have developed a level that is certain of publishing in Stroke.

Further, since Stroke is a top-notch worldwide log it is likely your documents therein are very well cited, for you to question the need to explore other journals so it’s natural. Preferably, with every brand new manuscript, you need to target the absolute most relevant journal with a greater effect element than compared to the log that posted your last paper. For instance, for you to try and have your next manuscript published in a considerably lesser known journal with lower impact factor just for the purpose of diversifying your target journals since you are well-published in Stroke, it would not make sense. If your manuscript fits the range of a higher-ranking log in the industry, you would certainly reap the benefits of publishing your manuscript here.

For young scientists wanting to establish on their own, it may possibly be beneficial to publish regularly in one single journal that is specialized in order that they gain recognition for the reason that industry. Senior scientists may choose to diversify and publish in 3 to 4 of the very most journals that are relevant. But also for scientists in a very niche industry, how many relevant SCI-indexed worldwide journals will be really small, and it also could possibly be fine to help keep publishing within the journal that is same. As an example, scientists devoted to feline surgery would believe it is appropriate to frequently publish into the Journal of Feline Medicine & operation.

So think about your log selection requirements one manuscript at any given time. Choose the log whose visitors will see your manuscript most fascinating. Publishing in prestigious access that is open is going to make work more available to visitors. Diversify your target journals if you think this can boost the effect of the work which help you achieve a wider audience.